40 of 2020

                                                                                                        

                                                              Newsletter No. 40 / 23 October 2020                            

Click on any ad to go to the advertisers website..

Made in SA not China – Complete overhaul of retail and clothing manufacturing in SA

This is a podcast from Cape Talk Radio from Sunday 18 October, interesting interview with guest Michael Lawrence the Executive Director at National Clothing Retail Federation.

LISTEN TO PODCAST arrow_forward

Made in SA, not China. Why Foschini, Mr Price and Truworths now want local clothes

By Garth Theunissen

  • After years of relying on Chinese imports, large South African clothing retailers are starting to source and manufacture more of their products locally.
  • This enables them to respond faster to local fashion and weather trends.
  • Sourcing SA-made summer clothes is easier than getting winter clothing, however.

South African clothing retailers are reconsidering their love affair with cheap Chinese imports in favour of locally manufactured apparel.

And while the disruption to international supply chains due to Covid-19 has emphasised the need to reduce reliance on Asian imports, the pandemic is not the sole reason behind the renewed interest in domestic production.

“It’s been building for a while as local manufacturing allows clothing retailers to respond much quicker to changing fashion styles or customer preferences,” says Brian Thomas, a portfolio manager at Laurium Capital. “It allows them to very quickly increase production of a particular item and get it onto shelves in a matter of weeks, whereas it can take northwards of two months before a shipment from Asia ends up on South African shelves.”

The Foschini Group (TFG), one of South Africa’s biggest dedicated clothing retailers, is leading the way with local manufacturing and has made it a strategic imperative to reduce its reliance on single source suppliers like China. TFG Africa now sources 35% of its clothing procurement from South Africa, whereas five years ago as much as 80% of its apparel items were imported from Asia.

“We can actually be more profitable as a retailer with locally manufactured goods than with imported goods,” TFG’s CEO Anthony Thunström told a media roundtable at the end of last month. “Local allows us to calibrate stock into our system with a much shorter lead time than we ever were able to in the past”.

TFG has been investing in “quick-response” local manufacturing capacity for the last seven years – i.e. their factories respond to sales by boosting production of items that are selling fastest.

This has enabled it to reduce its average lead time to produce a garment to just 42 days, whereas international supply chains typically average between 150 and 180 days.

These T-shirts – sold at The Foschini Group’s clothing retailer The Fix – were delivered within 37 days of the first concept, after it was designed locally and manufactured at TFG’s factory in Caledon.

With quick response manufacturing TFG can move a garment from production to being on the shelf in six weeks, allowing it to respond fast to new fashion and weather trends.

TFG’s factories in Maitland and Caledon in the Western Cape are currently running at 100% capacity and the group is looking at expanding the facilities over the next five years. That’s particularly important considering that 73% of its local production capacity is quick response.

Nevertheless, Thunström acknowledges that the advantages of local manufacturing do not apply to everything and are heavily reliant on economies of scale, fabric availability and the requisite skills needed to produce a particular product. For example, it is far easier to produce summer garments in South Africa than winter clothing which requires heavier fabrics and skills that are not yet readily available. But Thunström says these winter clothing skills will be developed in time.

Truworths

Truworths is another clothing retailer putting its faith in local manufacturing.

We have always favoured local manufacture because it enables ‘quick response’ and ‘fast fashion’ – and Truworths is a fast fashion business,” says Truworths CEO Michael Mark. “Our percentage of local textile to total textile purchases has now reached 45%. We anticipate this percentage will increase to around 50% over the next few years.”

Truworths recently concluded the purchase of Barrie Cline Clothing, a design house that has exclusively supplied the group for more than 20 years. A design house designs garments and orders fabrics and trims and then arranges for manufacture with local factories.

“Our local supply chain model is pivoted around our own design house and a few select design houses like Barrie Cline in which we are a dominant or the only customer,” says Mark. “Barrie Cline as the largest of these was an obvious acquisition for us.”

But there are challenges to local manufacturing such as an ageing skills base, an unstable power supply and rising electricity costs. Local manufacturing also doesn’t escape rand volatility as a sizeable portion of fabrics must still be imported.

“Manufacturing for South Africa is not for sissies,” says Thunström.

Mr Price

Even  Mr Price, which caters to more price sensitive, lower-income consumers than TFG and Truworths, is increasing its local content. Mr Price now sources 35% of total merchandise units from South Africa, which is worth about R9.2 billion in retail sales. That’s up from about 31% in 2015, which at the time totalled R3 billion in retail sales.

While China still represents 48.5% of Mr Price’s order book, the group is refocusing its energy on the South African market, which accounts for 92% of its revenue. It has exited Australia and Poland and is reducing its reliance on Chinese imports by exploring production in other African countries, which together with South Africa account for about 45.7% of its merchandise inputs.

Mr Price has also committed to procuring 1,357 tons of cotton from local producers via its membership of the South Africa Cotton Cluster (SACC). According to Mr Price the local cotton industry has boosted its output by 775% over the past seven years.

“We are totally committed to supporting more local manufacturing and the shift to local production in our order book is evidence of this,” says Matthew Warriner, Mr Price’s head of investor relations. “We are working closely with government, through the Retail-CTFL Master Plan 2030, and have identified a high level of volume that can be committed to local sourcing.”

The Retail-CTFL Master Plan 2030 is a commitment signed by the clothing retailers, labour and government in November last year, which will see them boost locally-produced goods to 65% of overall apparel items by 2030, from about 44% at present.

Game, Woolworths and Pep

Even Game, a retailer not typically associated with apparel, re-entered the affordable clothing market after 14 years with the launch of its Stylessentials clothing line in August this year.

“While 90% of the range is sourced from local suppliers, about 25% of the range is locally manufactured,” says Andrew Stein, VP for Game. “We would like to increase the percentage of locally-manufactured items as we progress with this offering, to ensure that we play our role in the support of local small businesses.”

Woolworths is also striving ahead to source more apparel locally with over 50% of its purchases coming from the SADC region. This reduces shipping time and provides some protection against currency volatility.

Pick n Pay Clothing has also announced a series of collaborations with South African fashion designers such as Gavin Rajah, Julia Buchanan and Katekani Moreku in an effort to make locally produced styles more accessible. These local designs are available at selected Pick n Pay stores as well as its online platform www.picknpayclothing.co.za.

Pep Clothing (PepClo), a division of Pepkor, has four local factory divisions manufacturing basic school clothing, knitted underwear and flip flops.

The unit produces 15 million items annually and has recently also started making personal protective equipment (PPE) with ambitions to produce 500 000 disposable gowns over the next financial year. PepClo, which currently employs 2,000 people, will also expand to produce coveralls from February 2021 once new waterproofing machinery has been installed at its Cape Town factory.  Business Insider S.A.

https://allfashionsourcing.cventevents.com/event/01c72252-1dcc-495d-8d9f-1e9ef34b5b07/regProcessStep1

Introducing the Falke Silver Cushion Sock

By Courtney Flury

Leading sock specialists Falke introduces The Silver Cushion sock- a cushioned sneaker and leisure sock for fresh feet. This style is an important addition to a well-rounded sock drawer that will have you feeling like you’re walking on air.

This sock stands out due to the innovative yarn combination of cotton and silver for anti-microbial all-weather freshness. Other features include a sensitive, pressure-free cuff, a cushioned sole with smooth elasticated upper for the best fit and comfort.

The Falke Silver Cushion sells for a retail price of R90 on www.falke.co.za and is available in size 4-7, in 7 colourways for women and size 8-12 in 6 colourways for men.  MyPressportal

Pepkor – Trading Statement

As reported in the Group’s interim results published on the JSE Stock Exchange News Service (“SENS”) on 27 May 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic is expected to have a negative impact on the Group’s performance and results for the year ending 30 September 2020. The unprecedented circumstances and volatile trading environment continue to impact the Group’s forecasting ability.

Pepkor hereby advises shareholders and noteholders that a reasonable degree of certainty exists that its earnings per share (“EPS”) and headline earnings per share (“HEPS”) for the year ending 30 September 2020 will decrease by at least 20%.
– EPS is expected to decrease by at least 12.5 cents per share (20%) when compared to the EPS of 62.6 cents reported for the year ended 30 September 2019 (the “Previous Period”); and
– HEPS is expected to decrease by at least 19.4 cents per share (20%) when compared to the HEPS of 96.8 cents reported for the Previous Period.

The decrease in EPS and HEPS can be attributed to the following factors:
1. The Group implemented IFRS 16: Leases (IFRS 16) on 1 October 2019 using a modified retrospective approach with no restatement of prior period reported results; and
2. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the performance in many areas of the Group, most notably through lost sales and increased provision levels on credit books. This has contributed to the likely impairment of carrying values of goodwill and intangible assets.

Further guidance as to the range by which the EPS and HEPS are likely to decrease will be provided once the required degree of certainty in terms of the Requirements has been established.

Liquidity update
As stated in the Trading Update published on SENS on 24 July 2020, the Group’s liquidity benefited from strong trading since the relaxation of lockdown measures, pro-active expense management, conservative credit granting, better-than-expected credit book collections and the successful completion of an accelerated bookbuild which raised R1.9 billion.

This allowed early settlement of the R1.5 billion bridge term loan facility which was due for repayment in August 2020 and early settlement of R4.0 billion of the total R6.0 billion preference share funding due to mature in May 2022. The Group has made significant progress in its ambition to degear the balance sheet and there is therefore no risk of debt covenants being breached at 30 September 2020.

The process to refinance R5.0 billion in debt due for repayment in May 2021 was successfully concluded and implemented on 30 September 2020, and the debt is now repayable in September 2023. In addition, the R1.0 billion bridge revolving credit facility originally due to expire in November 2021, has been extended to September 2023.

As part of the same process, debt covenants were amended to create sufficient headroom and enhanced flexibility going forward.

Did you know……..

One hundred sneaky years

The first sneakers were made by Keds in 1917. While most shoes had solid soles, which clicked loudly, the rubber soles were almost soundless — that’s why they were dubbed sneakers. Converse debuted their athletic shoe, the “All-Star” basketball shoe, in 1917 as well, and named it after basketball player and legendary Converse shoe salesman Charles H. “Chuck” Taylor in 1923. HIs signature was added to the shoes in 1932.

To Advertise…..   Click here to see fact sheet with advertising rates. 

Editorial Submission:

Please remember to send me your news so that we can share it with all our readers in the weekly newsletter. Although editorial is neither guaranteed nor implied, suitable editorial for consideration may be submitted to:-